Diabetic Retinopathy
reference: Jampol LM 2020 in NEJM (Review)
retinopathy develops from 10 yrs after onset of diabetes
increased retinal vessel permeability
hard exudates are intraretinal
non perfusion of capillaries tissue hypoxia drives vegf release
vascular permeability intra and subretinal fluid
neovascularisation develops, and can cause - vitreous haemorrhage - tractional retinal detachment -
ultrawide field photography allows for imaging of more than 80% of the retinal surface in a single image
there are three layers of retinal vessels
fluorescein angiography remains important for detecting leakage
pan retinal photocoagulation has revolutionised treatment
2010 drcr network showed that ranibizumab with immediate or delayed laser to the macula (if necessary) was better than laser alone
initial anti vegf has replaced macular laser therapy as the initial standard treatment in diabetic macular oedema
ivi triamcinolone had initiallly fained traction in tx diabetes, but the drcr network showed that laser photocaogulation was superiior to triamcinolone for dmo
sustained release steroids were also shown to reduce macular thickness, but they cause cataract and increase iop/cause glaucoma
anti vegf are generally cleared from the eye within a month, yet the duration of treatment varies
the optimal treatment protocol for antivegf remains unclear
but the injection protocol used in the drcr retina network trial for ranibizumab gives some guide. in that study: - monthly for 6 months - this is a bit intricate, come back to this later
there is a drcr reitna network trial comparing aflibercept to ranibizumab and bevacizumab
in this comparison, there was little difference when vision was better than 6/12 when vision was 6/18 or worse, then aflibercept had better vision that bevacizumab at 2 years
the main complications of proliferative diabetic reinotpathy are vitreous haemorrhage, retinal detachment, and neovascular glaucoma
the clarity study showed that at 1 year, patients receiving aflibercept did better than prp
a drcr retinal trial showed that ranibizumab were non inferior than prp at 2 and 5 years
desipte this, vegf needs regular injection, and there is high loss to follow up in which case, prp may be more suitable for patients, particularly with poor injection compliance / poor access to injections